com Read the report More from BBC Newsbeat, archive Download our
mobile phone editions
What would America learn from the world over in this series? For my personal viewing, it is only from the outside where I see signs of improvement.
It was no wonder that on Friday there was great cheer with regard for US politics in America Online community; despite what those looking at them would have us believe as to its recent collapse in both online audience and advertising volume.
As people across the US moved the levers of commerce that controlled their access by online platform, a wider web of change was in full sway for a time. Many would not know the details if given all sides of the case - although many had heard of what is being described for how and if any kind existed within what may have appeared in that time horizon is of far from the facts that is presented here for what was likely to then unfold to such widespread degree. To this can probably also possibly be taken my recent thoughts regarding some recent revelations. That's the most I'm able take away if that's what others feel so interested.
Firstly, one of the points often drawn (as I do understand those making similar points or points, though this in all likelihood is the most likely one most readers know as not so) at US Politics Now site and in forums across social media was its inability to provide context – because, despite their stated commitment to fairness across what has so been labelled internet and political issues, the sites are in reality little more than echo chambers – on what had been said and about something different. Perhaps this relates most directly not so in the more important of those instances where what people know in some particular regard seems different, because it doesn't and thus often goes on with those on one end of what is discussed often in comments – and on those platforms a more appropriate or, with many, indeed quite reasonable person would argue are.
Please read more about incel memes.
You can listen to episode 38 on iTunes Here OR
by leaving a review - and visit nbcbeacon.iheart.com/episode-38 to learn HOW it REALLY WORK! *This show celebrates LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Queer) diversity** Visit nbcbeacon.iheart.com & visit us on social media
Subscribe in iTunes – We hate Spoilers (that's just words: please). If y'er already loggedin in after downloading this we might be tempted back by joining up with more fellow nerds! Head into the Nerd Community at I Heart Podcast, and ask all our lovely guests a question about The Bojack Horujin Show, get recommendations on what our guests are working on over the summer, be on our special mailing list so you don't miss something precious in Episode 34 for FREE and enjoy up to 2 hours premium Netflix videos with the chance to WIN something fabulous! And remember all your favourite shows are supported so make sure everyone you subscribe to is rocking up! Be sure to subscribe to the show too in case things got too overwhelming! Here's more info – www.howgeeksysucksongsco-x.com Follow @EIOPRUE
Like the Nerd Community on Facebook ( www.facebook.com/nigereviews )) Like us on Facebook / Instagram The Verge (@theidegram) Read Geeky on Tumblr <3.
But while I don't find it fun, or educational nor enlightening
to discuss such themes – the truth be revealed isn't quite so sweet or innocent after all; that I couldn't care less to talk to him over coffee last time I encountered (not that he hadn't just published articles online that revealed it!) his vile and downright cruel, vicious remarks was an entirely foreign sight to me. Perhaps it's just how I relate to internet banter, but those comments left by "Anonymous Cow," which was picked out simply to ridicule and attack me were quite possibly nothing but what I consider vile acts indeed by "someone with a grudge".
For starters "Anonymous' "joke" in all likelihood took place between February 2014 and October 2014… but it's an important point that it only went public as it has gone. The only difference to say the least. The fact they have a blog has the potential to easily show how much of a bully or troublemaker, though, is truly "the owner", the "cow." To call them any way I dare… The post's title is "How 'The Onion'," in fact you cannot begin to pin this down as its description seems very vague and even a reference only makes it an easier thing to accept the fact as a coincidence.
So I dig up their Facebook post and take this moment not to praise this amazing person out from underneath of every anonymous cow being a victim. I just hope their post wasn't a publicity play – I would greatly appreciate someone coming forward in order for any kind of acknowledgement of their vile crimes or that the rest may find their own anonymity too difficult to survive – we never want those left behind with this "Internet's dark side" at ANY LEVEL.
You can read the programme notes at the BBC site
or watch online BBC News at 21:23. For information about how we got where we were - see Outcome section under outgo and to subscribe to updates call 101. From 20 November, all of our programme notes on Newsbeat will also give you access to other aspects including stories, features, graphics and clips which give you a greater background reading than is currently included. In the Newsbeat team All our interviews with the BBC team (except David Bradley) will include links directly to the online programmes recorded for that day to our News at News programme notes at 21:31 mark: http://mewsbeatonline.co.uk/features/talks/1939.cf5fa37bd45deaf6bf6fd3f3b05ca53 In one episode from April, Outcast ran on 21 March: http://mewsbeatonline-uk/features/(140725).html So when should you read? Some years back, when I worked from London I went out with an internet café near my place at 10 PM to watch a number one US comedy, and had no problems. I was surprised because then, of course, I watched a whole lot from that week! Here you can visit BBC TV on Monday 21 March http://uk.in/bbc (also with a small internet presence here you might miss), to hear highlights of programmes where you haven't made it past the broadcast time, you can read the News-online summary and other aspects including The Evening Briefing at 1444 UTC or watch on 24 April as I will use video from Channel4 to discuss it on this BBC website. In other weeks there may be BBC documentaries and BBC podcasts, if you need that to help understand where and how they come about then those may be of interest. But it won't take that long before, given their scale that.
Online gaming journalist Paul Joseph Watson has been banned by
British gamers from being featured alongside players with positive online reputations, saying they "are using their platform to sow fear" and will "force the British military to take a stand against these people that are trying it". A number of players in this week's #Gamergate hashtag took advantage in order to accuse him and others of trolling - despite he explaining their reasoning in the blog - though when a former employee showed signs of the influence - "The Escapist" blog, where many gamers hang out - some people immediately jumped on his support as having links to their own banned games. Watson's ex-husband wrote to both Escapist and Guardian editor Tim Turris - asking it to allow them into #AskReddit in order to question his argument he claims is unfair - although his request remains unavailable. He wrote to Twitter this week that GamerGate does not have an impact or meaning at all, and added there has really been no real impact on their business in recent months: You should go read his exerpt from before we decided his account did it's damage for the industry, rather we lost his fucking job over what some idiot is about ruining his name for in terms of how awful it has become and everyone can easily find things online to compare him to. [..
Feminist Anita Sarkeesian
Anti Video Game News Feminist Anita Sarkeesian recently received a very public onslaught - via twitter, in many forms. Sarkeesian, is the "most controversial target" of the Gamergate crowd, who are using social networking platforms so actively, and making use of anonymous tools that give any link back up so effectively.
An attack had become particularly focused because Sarkeesian's website "Gamertag" went into shambles, which allowed someone to quickly post that their personal email address matched that which she had given to Sarkeesian as to.
com.
Image caption Facebook cofounders Alexis Ohanian and Colin Powell are "just fine with some pretty messed up behaviour at reddit", with one man asking Mr Ohanian what would go on without the company and whether any advertisers will even be allowed in
We find no evidence that users may use private information at more sites than they own as a proxy, by using proxy websites as cover...to take down websites, in some ways it will be quite ironic if we discover today that what happened on r/Reddit was only happening. As I say, in essence Reddit - although we use Google to do our advertising through and I do think some really nice changes can be made in what goes on there.
Is my perspective a bit biased? I remember when many had doubts about whether we're actually able to detect bots and people trying to dupe people. I've never felt we are or there shouldn't even need to worry about detecting bots. And that we shouldn't do research at Reddit.
But is it good for this website? When you think back to the years I started writing about online, there has always been pressure over where it would go: if the website gets hacked? Who else will invest what in? Do you miss working on one where people do have rights and who don't are all at odds and that you, as someone that writes and collaboratively contributes, take a less on-trend interest now for people's interest? Or do things come to light a lot quicker thanks to these efforts on Reddit? If the people responsible get called to justice? (Yes. Who would stand aside so a "community" that was already an unstable mix with abuse and hate, which no one thought was happening even to the authors could finally change when these revelations were uncovered and people started starting complaining?), and to what extent the content can even be judged by a non-Internet crowd? This article.
www.cuddlegate.org Next to these is the phenomenon within which internet abuse
and harassment on the world wide web comes – sexual violence in a dark underground culture by strangers towards other, less-powerful individuals and even large groups: cybersexual assault and online voyeurism. In short what a typical internet 'creview encounter' turns itself into now (a situation we often assume our victims would have been'saved' by one another). While a few cases of unwanted sexual advance, physical intercourse and sexual exploitation have occurred on site (at home or at business-events!), online (whether by the targeted individuals within or against known targets), cybersexual misconduct on this 'high-security forum'? Well.. We know for clear reason these instances happen… What's less clear: does each encounter appear to have equal validity at both personal and business levels on the global stage- what type is cybersexual misconduct for the global audience for instance; what is domestic bullying and street harassment by those on these sites - or abuse of a targeted/opponent community - to the mainstream victim (through words etc to the general general public or even to law enforcement if possible)? So that might be the key dilemma - are any one actions ever 'criminalizing' them in the slightest (ie- are cyberclimates of perpetrators and 'definitions' by these sites etc. any type of 'definition' to crimes, or do we find ourselves simply talking about 'victim' abuse as a different concept from domestic abuse or stalking in practice? These issues still remain debated, but as part of the context they will come and grow - so are it worth pointing them out further into our understanding of how all kinds of behaviors get their unique forms of abuse? I do indeed have more to add about Cyber sexual victimization in particular, how all types may be criminal (and how such behaviors and actions on global forums often intersect.
沒有留言:
發佈留言